ISOBELLECARMODYROCKS wrote: I don't see why I'm not allowed to reply to posts that are a year or two old.
It's not so much that you're not allowed to, it's that if you're not actually bringing any new information or a new angle, etc, to a topic, you're not actually contributing anything to it at all and hence replying is pointless because you're not "resurrecting" the topic as it's sometimes called. You're just "bumping" the topic (posting to make it appear in the new posts list, and higher in its subforum) for no reason at all. It looks like you're just trying to increase your post count, which is bad forum etiquette.
It's especially not good for a quiet place like CO, when members get topic reply notifications and come back to see something pointless, they're less likely to come back when they get notifications (instead ignoring them completely), so when someone does post something relevant to a topic they've participated in in the past they won't notice. It's important that everything is relevant if we want to keep the members we have and bring back former regulars when topics they've started or participated in are resurrected.
There are actually not a lot of new threads on this site so I have really got no choice but to reply to the other one's.
You don't have to post anything, there's no rule saying you have to post with a certain regularity in order to be a member of CO. Alternatively, you can start new topics to stimulate NEW discussion.
Where are these rules
In Isobelle's Landing. It's called "CO: A User's Manual" so most people read it when they first join.
The part Akinimod is referring to is this:
We have posting standards at Carmody-Online which are quite simple to meet: post intelligently. We have a dim view of spamming/post-padding at Carmody-Online — pointless posts that do not contribute to the progress of the topic will be deleted without notice. Woe betide those who think they can increase their post count through spam/post-padding.